September 2, 2020: PAUMA BAND OF LUISENO MISSION v. State of California and California Gambling Commission
The panel agreed with the district court that the State satisfied its obligation to negotiate in good faith under IGRA because the State agreed to negotiate for the new types of class III gaming that Pauma sought authorization to offer at its casino, actively engaged in the negotiations, and remained willing to continue the negotiations when Pauma filed this litigation.
PAUMA v ca bad faith negotations .pdf — PDF document, 93 KB (95947 bytes)
Document Actions