Lytton
- May 27, 2015: Governor Brown Letter to Congressman Huffman
- Governor Brown supports the MOU between the County of Sonoma and the Lytton Band. The Governor also supports the Lytton Rancheria Homelands Act.
- Nov. 13, 2014: Doctor's Medical Clinic Preliminary
- October 29, 2014: General and Specific Plan Amendments for Re-zoning of Doctor's Medical Clinic
- Includes forward looking statements of a purchase by the Lytton Band and potential expansion onto the contagious 12 ac.
- 2014: List of Contributions to Governor Brown
- March 28, 2012: Casino Payout Flyer
- Casino San Pay-Low
- Oct. 25, 2011: Neighbors of Casino San Pablo v. Salazar
- July 18, 2011: AG's Comments on Lytton Fee to Trust Windsor
- March 30, 2011: Neighbors of Casino San Pablo Complaint against Interior and NIGC re: Lytton Rancheria Gaming Dismissed
- DC Order Dismissing Complaint
- March 15, 2010: Neighbors of Casino San Pablo v. Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar
- This is a complaint under the administrative procedures act. Here is a link to the press release on the Lytton lawsuit: http://www.scribd.com/doc/28477762/NCSP-Lawsuit-Press-Release There is a link to the complaint at www.fddcm.com.
- Oct. 2009: Sonoma County Comments Lytton Fee to Trust
- The attached comments submitted by Sonoma County to the Environmental Assessment (EA) issued by Lytton with respect to its 92 acre, 147 unit proposed residential development.
- Oct. 8, 2009: Governor's Comments on Lytton Fee to Trust
- August 2005: Gambling with Our Future
- August 2005 Crime Report Citizens Against Casinos - East Bay Coalition
- Aug. 1, 2005 Contra Costa County Casino SP health EMS impacts.pdf
- 2005: Unratified Lytton Compact
- June 29, 2004: Indian Reservation Proclamation
- SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary— Indian Affairs proclaimed approximately 9.53 acres, more or less, as an addition to the reservation of the Lytton Rancheria of California on June 29, 2004. This notice is published in the exercise of authority delegated by the Secretary of the Interior to the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs by 209 DM 8.1.
- Scan_Doc0148.pdf
- Scan_Doc0147.pdf
- Scan_Doc0146.pdf
- Scan_Doc0145.pdf
- Scan_Doc0144.pdf
- Scan_Doc0143.pdf
- Scan_Doc0142.pdf
- Scan_Doc0141.pdf
- Scan_Doc0140.pdf
- Scan_Doc0139.pdf
- Scan_Doc0138.pdf
- Scan_Doc0137.pdf
- Scan_Doc0136.pdf
- Scan_Doc0135.pdf
- Scan_Doc0134.pdf
- Scan_Doc0133.pdf
- Scan_Doc0132.pdf
- Scan_Doc0131.pdf
- Scan_Doc0130.pdf
- Scan_Doc0129.pdf
- Scan_Doc0128.pdf
- Scan_Doc0127.pdf
- Scan_Doc0126.pdf
- Scan_Doc0125.pdf
- 1939 Trouble - Geyserville Indian group doesn't want Steel.pdf
- Dec. 1938 Dry Creek Rancheria protests Bert Steel moving on.pdf
- Feb. 1, 1939 Lytton lay idle.pdf
- Feb. 1, 1939 Sac Indian Agency.pdf
- Guide to documents on Lytton.pdf
- Jan. 9, 1939 Bert Steel moves from Covelo Res to Lytton.pdf
- Scan_Doc0124.pdf
- Scan_Doc0123.pdf
- Scan_Doc0122.pdf
- Scan_Doc0121.pdf
- Scan_Doc0120.pdf
- Scan_Doc0119.pdf
- Scan_Doc0018.pdf
- Scan_Doc0117.pdf
- Scan_Doc0016.pdf
- Scan_Doc0115.pdf
- Scan_Doc0114.pdf
- Scan_Doc0113.pdf
- Scan_Doc0112.pdf
- Scan_Doc0111.pdf
- Scan_Doc0110.pdf
- Scan_Doc0109.pdf
- Scan_Doc0108.pdf
- Scan_Doc0107.pdf
- Scan_Doc0106.pdf
- Scan_Doc0105.pdf
- Scan_Doc0104.pdf
- Scan_Doc0103.pdf
- Scan_Doc0102.pdf
- Scan_Doc0101.pdf
- Scan_Doc0100.pdf
- Scan_Doc0099.pdf
- Scan_Doc0098.pdf
- March 14, 1991: Lytton Settlement
- Lytton Settlement restoring the Tribe to its prior status
Document Actions